I've recorded my notes for the reading using more traditional ICT methods (e.g. Word Processor) and you can see them in PDF format here (shared publicly via my Google Docs), however I thought the blog would be a good space to reflect on the questions posed to us at the end of week 1 ...
What counts as evidence in this work?
- Quantitative …
o Pre and post-course questionnaires (primary)
o Grades, SAT scores
o Records of online activity - Qualitative …
o Participant observation in class conferences
o Personal interviews with students
o Case reports by instructors
- Is the Virtual Classroom (VC) a viable option for education delivery? (On the whole, are outcomes at least as good as those for traditional face-to-face courses?) - Quantitative approach
- What variables are associated with especially good and especially poor outcomes in this new teaching and learning environment? - Qualitative approach
- To provide further detail of terms used (e.g. software descriptions)
- To support the claim that a collaborative learning approach helps teachers and learners, as active participants in the learning process, construct their own knowledge and therefore their own learning (as opposed to knowledge transfer)
- To support the claim that CMC opens up new educational options for both teachers (e.g. in terms of curriculum design/learning activities) and learners (e.g. flexible self-paced access, accessing searchable material, improved writing skills).
- Collaborative learning strategies and approaches underpin the use of CMC via theVC
(Also, suggestions of self-directed learning, self-paced learning) - Blended Learning (mixed-mode) delivery
No comments:
Post a Comment